In-House vs. Hire: A Tough Choice

When it comes to handling communications or creative projects, deciding between hiring external help or keeping it in-house can be tricky. Hiring outside experts offers fresh perspectives, but they might not fully grasp your vision. On the flip side, managing in-house can stretch already limited capacity and lead to burnout. For non-profits and impact organizations, whose resources are often spread thin, this choice feels even heavier.  

With tight budgets and teams juggling multiple roles, balancing day-to-day responsibilities while driving growth and meaningful change is a constant challenge. However, their unwavering commitment to making an impact remains clear. The question is: how can they tackle these projects without draining their limited resources or diluting their mission?  

Finding a solution starts with understanding the organization’s needs and challenges. It’s not just about creating great designs or clever campaigns but ensuring the work is purposeful and impactful. The right approach integrates empathy, vision, and strategy to support organizations in not just reaching their goals but creating lasting change.

Think of this scenario: you are a nonprofit focused on serving families with children in foster care and wanted to launch an awareness campaign. Your in-house team was stretched thin, juggling client services and administrative tasks. You tried managing creative duties internally, but the added workload led to missed deadlines and burnout. Bringing in an external partner with nonprofit expertise allowed you to offload the creative burden, ensuring the campaign reflected your mission authentically while letting your team focus on service delivery. This collaboration empowered you to raise funds without compromising your core work or exhausting your team, showing the power of balancing external help with internal focus.

Take, for example, a nonprofit Ranger worked with that unknowingly used a photo on their website without proper permissions. They were soon faced with the threat of a lawsuit. It’s a situation we hear about far more often than you’d think, and one that highlights how stretched teams may inadvertently miss critical details. This underscores the value of working with a partner who understands these risks and ensures the organization’s creative assets are not only compelling but also legally secure.

By bridging gaps and fostering collaboration, the best solutions empower these organizations to focus on what they do best: making a difference.

By Kyle Bruce